Author: S R Larson (presentation)
Before Sverigedemokraterna (the Swedish Democrats) won seats in the Swedish national parliament in September last year there was not a critical word uttered in the Riksdag about Sweden’s immigration policy. Today the situation is different: SD politicians take every opportunity to challenge the reckless open-borders policies imposed by the political elite. The first reaction from that elite was to expand an already excessively generous immigration policy to invite even more immigrants from far-away corners of the world. Though this might have been expected (I personally did not think they would have the audacity) it is nevertheless refreshing to see that the SD challenge is not going unnoticed by the elite.
The fact of the matter is that the SD challenge has come at the very last moment: the open borders policy has overwhelmed Sweden with immigration of a size and character that begs the question if the prime minister actually knows what he is doing. The official motive for allowing massive immigration is that Sweden is in desperate need of workforce immigration. Presumably, the retirement of the baby boomers born in the 1940s leaves so many open spots on the labor market that native Swedes cannot possibly fill them. Therefore, the story goes, Sweden needs to invite as many marginally educated Somalis and Afghans as possible.
The flaws in this argument are so many that it is surprising it is still being used. To begin with, the 1940s generation has been retiring for about eight years already. The average retirement age in Sweden has been hovering around 62-63 for a long time, which means that of almost one million 40s boomers, some 700,000 have already retired. Any student of the Swedish economy knows that this has not caused any massive shortage of labor at all. On the contrary, over the past ten years the employment rate of the Swedish work force has actually dropped from 67 percent to 64 percent. A larger share of the work force is without a job today than during the Millennium recession, despite the baby boomer generation’s retirement.
It is easy to see why this drop in employment has taken place. In an economy that creates 60,000 new jobs per year in good economic times, the employment rate cannot rise if there is also a large net immigration taking place. Over the past ten years immigration has increased from 60,000 per year to 100,000. During the same time, according to Statistics Sweden migration data, emigration has risen from 33,000 to 48,000 resulting in a significant growth in net migration: ten years ago immigration exceeded emigration by 27,000 people. Today net immigration exceeds 52,000 per year, with a record high of 63,000 in 2009.
These numbers should be considered in view of Sweden’s population of only nine million. To make matters worse, there is a persistent education gap between people leaving and coming to Sweden. Very few immigrants have a high school degree, while the average emigrant has at least a BA university degree.
It is obvious that the arithmetic of Sweden’s immigration policy is working against the best interests of the Swedish people and the Swedish economy. Exporting educated workers and importing uneducated people is bad enough; importing two uneducated workers for everyone who leaves is directly irresponsible. Who is going to pay for the education of these immigrants? If Sweden really had an insatiable need for workforce immigration, then how come the 30 countries within the EU and the Nordic region cannot satisfy that need? Why would Sweden have to rely on the remotest – geographically, culturally and socially – corners of the world to fill its workforce need, provided such a need existed? (Which, again, it does not.)
A couple of factoids from Eurostat, the statistics agency of the EU, further underscore how out-of-control irresponsible this immigration policy actually is. Sweden is Europe’s second-largest recipient of immigrants – in absolute numbers – from the least-developed nations in the world. Only Britain takes in more least-developed immigrants, and its rationale lies in its commonwealth past. Furthermore, in 2007 this small nation, with less than three percent of the EU population, took in 16 percent of all asylum seekers absorbed by the EU. No other EU country accepted a larger share than Sweden.
The asylum-driven inflow is steadfastly growing. Apparently, Sweden has made a name for itself as having open borders: from 2007 to 2010 the number of asylum seekers coming to Sweden increased by 50 percent, with a 32-percent increase from 2009 to 2010 alone.
There is no way to motivate Sweden’s immigration madness, no matter how you slice immigration and labor market statistics. The country has opened its borders, lowered the bar for immigrants with questionable documentation and made its welfare state available even to those who are denied immigration or asylum. The challenge from the Swedish Democrats came in the nick of time. The question is: will it make a difference in the nick of time?
pi, pi, pi, biv, biv, tg, tg, vg, vl, vl, vl, po, po, ft, ft, ft, nr, nr, nr, dt.
st, st, av, pcf, bt, bt, db, db, db, gd, gd, ek, ek, ek, ne, ne, ne, mn, mn, mn, mn, al, al, bk, bk, ln, ln, dm, svt, svt, nm, nm, svt, svt, ft, ft, sr, sr, sr, sr, sr, sr, sr, sr, sr, kj, kk, cc, ha, ai, kt, dn, dn ,dn, dn, svd, svd, svd, svd, ex, gp, gp, gp, gp, gp, smp, smp, smp, sd, sd, sd.
“The question is: will it make a difference in the nick of time?”
Short answer: Unlikely
Right now, we have about 2 million with immigrant background and about 7.5 million “regular” swedes.
It is quite possible that both emigration and immigration will increase significantly in the near future. In Holland, we have seen emigration numbers at around 1% of the population, mainly driven by the third worldization of the large cities. So far, most “white flight” in Sweden takes place within the country. This could very well change as the safe places are rapidly becoming fewer.
On the immigration side, it is clear that Sweden is opening up for more unskilled third world immigration at the same time as all other western countries are trying hard to do the opposite. A significant increase therefore seems likely.
Thus, we could soon see 100.000 mainly educated swedes leave and 200.000 unskilled persons from MENA enter on a yearly basis.
How long could this go on before the country starts to break down? Less than 3 years would be my guess. What will happen after is very hard to say, bút it is likely to be violent. Free and fair elections in 2014 are, in my opinion, unlikely.
The more time passes by I get more convinced that the election 2010 was the last election ever. When Sweden starts to break down, one of the first things that will happen is that the Sweden Democrats will be outlawed and the members and supporters both prosecuted and persecuted, many even killed. The process to final breakdown will most probably start already this year. I expect a long hot and violent summer. At some point before september 2014 the mohammedans will grab the power and that will be the end of Sweden as we know it. My only consolation is that most of the traitors will be either shot or hanged after that. But for us swedes it will spell hell on earth quite literary.
I mostly agree.
But I do not think that “mohammedans will grab the power” and that will be that. My best guess (real numbers are hard to get) is that we have around 750.000 people from muslim countries in Sweden but a meaningful proportion of these may be non muslims, i.e christians.
If we look at younger people, it is clear to me that there is a very rapid polarization going on, i.e. significant numbers (maybe 15-20%) support SD but you also have very strong support for the extreme left.
The young ethnic swedes are far more informed about the realities of multiculture since they have been affected much more than the older groups. On the other hand, the massiv school propaganda has also produced a large number of agressive “anti-racists”.
Then we have the immigrantas, which to a large extent comes from some of the most violent contries on this planet. They are divided in to several groups, based on nationality and/or religion.
Since the immigration has been dominated by people that are young, they represent a larger proportion of the younger age groups. Given that about 20% of the whole population is immigrant, it seems reasonable to assume that they are between 30 and 40% of the under 18 group. (Does anybody have hard numbers?)
So we may already be at, or rapidly coming to, something like this in the younger age groups:
20% are ethnic Swedes that oppose multiculture
20% are ethnic Swedes that don’t care about multiculture
20% are ethnic Swedes that promotes multiculture
20% are muslims
20% are people that have escaped Islam
Of course, these are only very basic approximations and we can argue all day about the size and composition of the various groups . In any case, this seems like a setup for at prolonged civil war along the lines of Libanon or Yugoslavia. And remember, wars are fought by young men and it is far from clear what group would have the strongest numbers.
I don’t agree with that number. First, there has been officially 4-500000 arselifters here for at least a decade. So those numbers are obviously not correct. Aside from the continuing massimmigration, another thing to take into account is that it wasn’t that long ago the total population was 8 million. A couple of years ago it reached to 9,5 million and is soon to be expected to break through to 10 million. So from that I expect we have between 1 million and 1,5 million arselifters in Sweden already. Also considering all the different witnesses online who tells of their local habitat swarming with arselifters like flies it is highly likely my numbers are more close to the truth. Especially if we also take into account the high criminality these days.
I am an immigrant, GIVE ME MONEY AND HEALTH CARE!
~The Dippylomat esq.
I’m sorry to report that I’ve seen this play before, many times over though on a much smaller scale. It is the typical story of the American city . You can visit any one of a number of of them and see the story in the architecture. Looking at the structures you can see that the neighborhoods have seen better and happier days but the culture that built those houses has long been displaces by other cultures that don’t seem to build much of anything and don’t even seem much interested in maintaining anything either.
And now American cities suck. The good people that built them voted with their feet long ago. It’s quite obvious that the failing inner city schools were not always failing schools. It’s quite obvious that the crack house was not always a crack house. So what happened? Well the answer is obvious, but the willful stupidity of political correctness has bred a generation of ethical and moral cowards who refuse to confront the issue. People themselves turned schools into into failing schools. People turned residences into crack houses. These were choices people made. And the politically incorrect truth of the matter is that is wasn’t those of Northern European ancestry that made those choices.
The argument that it is economics that is responsible for this decline is absolutely ridiculous and easily refuted by the stories of the millions of European immigrants that reached America’s shores penniless and often even as indentured servants. But their work ethic, values, and culture allowed them to hack an existence out of the wilderness and build the world’s largest economy in the span of a couple hundred years. It’s a tribute to Western Civilization and Philosophy at it zenith, before it became fashionable to wallow in cesspools of self-pity and immerse oneself in navel gazing angst .
But that zenith is now in the past. Now we live in a age of lies, delusion and perpetual adolescence. And we are seeing the consequences of it. And they are consequences that those who are imposing the lies and delusion seem to do a very good job of insulating themselves from. In both Europe and the US, the story is the same. The elitists who impose these policies are far removed from the problems they create. And It quite a game they play, creating problems, then offering themselves up as the solution. And curiously enough their bank accounts swell in in the process. but I’m sure that’s just a coincidence. It is just a coincidence, isn’t it? Surely it is!
We Americans (Canadians, and Aussies also, for that matter) are a bit more fortunate than most Europeans in that we have, can, and will continue to ‘vote with our feet’ when dealing with the social engineering busybodies. We have enough real estate to permit it. But voting with one’s feet does nothing to solve the root cause of the problem, that problem being the mental illness. The same insanity (and other flavors of insanity) exist here, but we still have options (and it seems a bit more spirit to fight the fight to keep those option open).
As the large number of British accents that I encounter here in the USA attests to, the British exodus is well underway. Perhaps it is also time for Swedes to ready the lifeboats, unless of course, Swedes expect completely different results from doing the exact same things.
I have no intention of going anywhere. I’m going down with the ship. There’s not one other place in this world where I want to live but my beloved and beautiful Skåne (Scania). This is the place where I was born and also the place where I will eventually die. When the arselifters grabs the power I will go underground and be part of the resistance. I expect them to do the power grab before the next election in 2014. I’ll stay and fight simply because I would soon be very homesick if I emigrated anyway. I would never feel at home in another country and constantly long for Skåne.
That’s cool. Standing one’s ground and fixing the problem has always got to be the first choice. But there’s a point at which it no longer makes sense to do so and each individual must decide for oneself where that tipping point is and how big a change they are willing to make in order to live the quality life that they wish to live.
Some people flee on a whim, others actually look forward to a zombie apocalypse. 🙂
I’m not suggesting that’s you, I’m just saying it’s different for each individual.
“each individual must decide for oneself ”
I agree.
But I would also like to add that it is important to make a well informed choise. Robin is clearly going in to what may come with open eyes and that is all fine. However, most swedes prefer to live in some kind of fairy tale and actually belive that no matter how massive the demografic changes, nothing really bad can happen, because this is after all Sweden.
My view is that you have to face reality and act based on this. 10-15 years ago, there was a very realistic chance to stop the downfall but it is now to late. The damage has already been done and the current leadership is now doing everything they can to speed up the break down. Sweden is already gone as a western country and the only saving grace is that you can still leave the country without any problems. But the exit door is starting to close, as we saw when Denmark reinstated border controls. I have followed the immigration debate in Europe for a long time and based on this it is my strong opinion that it is only a matter of a few years until it will become very difficult to travel with a Swedish passport.
“Sweden is in desperate need of workforce immigration”
And how will importing koranimals help with that?
The average IQ in sub-saharan Africa is just 70. In Sweden it is 103, 30 % higher. Hence a population with an average IQ of 103 will eventually create a nice advanced country like Sweden, Germany, Japan etc. whereas a population with an average IQ of 70 will eventually create a hellish country like the democratic republic of the Congo, Somalia, Zimbabwe etc.
[Nobel prize winning geneticist James Watson said in a interview in 2007 > I am inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa” because “all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really”
there is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capacities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically. Our wanting to reserve equal powers of reason as some universal heritage of humanity will not be enough to make it so.
As regards IQ, this article on a book by Byron M. Roth, The Perils of Diversity: Immigration and Human Nature, is reviewed by Richard Lynn:
http://www.alternativeright.com/main/blogs/hbd-human-biodiversity/a-whimper-and-a-bang/
It takes up the differences of IQ in the world. Our outlooks are not very well, according to the book, not with this self-destructive immigration. I recommend you to read the text.
I have read that article, Cavatus, and I will order the book.
Is it correct that some groups have lower average IQ than others? It does seem to be the case but I am unsure of what relevance that has. Does it really matter if we get colonialized by stupid or smart people? If anything, I would prefer them to be stupid since that would mean a higher likelihood of defeating them in a potential conflict.
My view is that values and culture are far more relevant than IQ when it comes to beeing able to co-exist. Sure, the best thing would be to get smart people that shares our values but we could at least handle a significant inflow of rather stupid people if they had similar basic values. Large groups with totally different values. like arab muslims, will never be “integrated” regardless of their IQ level.
Well, according to the article, different people seem to have different IQ. There is a classification and a discussion here (in Swedish): http://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ_and_the_Wealth_of_Nations. Of course culture is essential as well, but the high IQ peoples of Asia and their immigrants are far more easily integrated/assimilated into the Western society than certain other immigrants. Does this depend on the IQ? I am not the one to judge, but scientific data may give a hint.
“Of course culture is essential as well, but the high IQ peoples of Asia and their immigrants are far more easily integrated/assimilated into the Western society than certain other immigrants. Does this depend on the IQ?”
In the UK, there are very large groups of muslims from Pakistan and Hindus from India. The difference in outcome for these two groups is massive. In my view, it is hard to argue that these groups have different IQ levels since they have been living side by side for thousands of years, but I admit that I do not know. There has been a lot written about the muslim habit of cousins marrying each other and that could of course have significant detrimental effects. Sennels have done some writing on this.
This current pc propaganda that cites the differences we notice between populations to be just so trivial as to be of no real consequence (Race is just a social construct with no biological meaning ) this has been used to undemine national idenity therein paving the way for the creation of the “Universal Republic”
Since January 2010, France has been engaged in a “debate” on national identity which has evolved into an exercise in government-sponsored propaganda calculated to remind white Frenchmen that they are nothing. Minister of Immigration and National Identity Eric Besson in talks on “national identity” chose to debate national identity mainly with men of North African origin. He stated that “there is only a France where the blood is mixed,” thereby erasing the existence of a distinct French nation. For Besson, “France is neither a people, nor a language, nor a territory, nor a religion; it is a conglomerate of peoples who want to live together. There is no ethnic Frenchman; there is only an ethnically mixed France.”
.
Ever since Lewontin claimed in 1972 that there is more genetic variation between two individuals than between populations the left has seized upon this making it a principle tenet of pc orthodoxy. If a population are told that they are indistingushable from every other population on earth except for prehaps the color of their skin, it leaves little reason to resist invasion.
This later became known as the Lewontin’s fallacy after A.W.F Edwards debunked Lewontin in his 2003 paper. Recent studies using microsatellite markers in gene frequency are able to identify the different racial groups with almost 100% accuracy. even close populations like the French and the Germans can be distinguished from one another using this technology. It seem like nations have a certain genetic component to them.
http://rafonda.com/html/genetic_reality_of_race.html
http://news.discovery.com/history/oldest-human-israel-101228.html
Interesting facts your are delivering. I could never imagine that France as well would start campaigns against its own inhabitants, just like Sweden. I mean, I have always had the notion that Frenchmen are rather proud and self-confident. But perhaps the French state is working on breaking this self-confidence down as is the Swedish establishment. These racial findings are interesting to that extent that they are very controversial and often are in contrast to all that the authorities and media proclaim. No wonder that it is controversial. Our politicians are playing a high game and there is much at stake for them if they are unmasked.
Cavatus,
“I mean, I have always had the notion that Frenchmen are rather proud and self-confident”
That may well be correct regarding Frenchmen. However, the french ladies may act in a very different way.
Is it not a fact that the most feminist country in Europe, i,e. Sweden, is also the country that is most frantic about committing suicide?
Maybe it is time to really talk about the pink elephant………..
What do you think, Cavatus? Would this total collapse of Sweden have happend if only men could vote?
Difficult to say. My theory is the following: If the way people are held ignorant by media would continue to prevail, I think that the current situation would not have arisen if only men had been allowed to vote. But if people had been completely informed in media and by politicians about the drawbacks of the multicultural society, I don’t think that the voters’ sex would have made any difference. So unfortunately I must admit that Swedish women are more easily tricked.
You may well be correct. I have a general feeling that there is a connection between the degree of feminst influence and the ongoing national suicide. But I may be wrong and in any case it does not really matter anymore. It is what it is. Only a miracle can save the country. Let’s hope we get one, but also remember that it is best to plan on the basis of more realistic assumptions. Have a look at Åland! There you can still live your life in swedish, but without the multiculture. And it is relatively easy to get a finnish passport. Or look at Denmark.
If you are determined to stay, take a close look at what has happend to other countries that have fallen in to ethnic conflicts and plan accordingly.
Cavatus,
Thoralf had a post regarding this:
He got an email from a male teacher that states that the support of multiculturalism is differentiated according to gender. The female teachers supports it based on emotional arguments and the male teachers are opposed but don’t dare to speakt up. This very much agrees with my experience from Sweden.
http://thoralfalfsson.webblogg.se/2011/june/tre-mail-fran-lasare-av-bloggen.html#comment
My view: It is really sad that so many vomen are guided by emotional arguments, but it is even worse that so many men have lost their spine.
Yes, and I recalled a discussion here on the topic if the result of the general election would be different if only men could vote and I answered that, yes, in the current circumstances, the result would be different, and no, if women were given all the facts, statistics and information on the consequences of the multicultural policy, they would not be influenced that much by their feelings and care more for the future of their own children than other’s children.
Here we go again.
The swedish migration board just announced that in practice everybody living in Libya will now have the right to asylum in Sweden. It is the same type of ruling that has led to the massive inflow of somalis in the past few years.
http://www.migrationsverket.se/info/4243.html
It may be interesting to know that Italy has an agreement with Libya since 2004 that means that most african immigrants to Italy are deported to Libya, without any rights to asylum. Recently, this agreement was more or less extended with the rebels in Libya.
So all of Africa is trying to get in to Italy, and they are then deported to Libya, which means that they have automatic rights to asylum in Sweden!
No doubt, there will be a fine mix of new settlers (as the centerparty now openly calls immigrants) that will soon be coming to Sweden.
Anybody that still thinks that 200.000 immigrants in 2012 sounds unrealistic?
This really frightens me and there is no reaction in media – not to be expected. How could the PM Reinfeldt keep this Social Democrat who is the head of the Migration Board? This reveals that they are birds of a feather.
Cavatus,
You have only been watching events with a critical eye for a few years. I have been doing it since the late 80ies.
There is nothing new about this. I remember the second Iraq war, when the the immigration board made a similar ruling. At the time, there was a bit of debate at Kurt Lundgrens blogg and I also had a number of conversations with people about it. The reaction was very similar to this ruling, i.e. nothing. Anybody that was even half awake could clearly see that it would mean a massive inflow of asylum seeker, since no other western country would accept that liberated Iraq was in a state of “internal armed conflict”. But if you pointed this out, you were ignored and/or labeled with the usual names.
The same goes for Somalia, Afgahnistan, Lebanon, etc, etc.
I really can’t take it anymore. Let’s hope that I am wrong and that there is some drastic reaction coming, but after more that 20 years of waiting, I can’t watch this anymore. This summer will be the last that I take my family to Sweden. Skansen was a very important place to me and I always took the kids there. Now, I would not go even if they paid me.
You are probably right here. I have woken up too late. There are too many marxists at power at all levels in this process and too many of them in media as well. That is why there is no reaction. Don’t forget Churhill’s words: “There is no public opinion, only a published opinion.” And this is the reason why no one reacts in Sweden to these completely frantic decisions.
I am a great fan of Churchill and have read some of his books.
Regarding Sweden, I would choose the following words from the great man:
“The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter”.
Yes, Churchill was a great man. Today he would be considered as a politically incorrect person, particularly regarding his statements on Islam.
Now, if you choose that slogan, you are in good company with Swedish politicians and Swedish media, who treat the inhabitants like blockheads. So after all, whose side are you on 😉
Today Churchill would be branded with all sorts names such as rightwing extremist, racist and islamophobe. I’m pretty sure the same fate would happen to our own former PM Tage Erlander because of certain things he stated back in the 60’s which is in total opposition to todays PC MC agenda.
[…] bygger på lögn. Jag ska störta den med sanning. Sanningen ska göra er fria. Sanningar som att massinvandring pågår, att traditionell tro är värd att värna och att Sverige historiskt sett är ett bra land och en […]
Hello neighbours i live across the big river and the situation starts to look like the before our civil war but in other meanings same levels.
better not that happen starrt reasoning what you have ahead!
Native Swedes welcome to finland we form a defence line zombie here and strike back have to go norway anyway to free those poor vikings who are like fucking shadows what theyve been Wacking discrase