Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for May, 2010


Finally the sentence was passed. In one of my former blogposts I wrote about this abominable manslaughter of the 78-year-old woman on a parking lot in Landskrona.

A few days ago the law court found that Ahmad Akileh, with Lebanese citizenship, was guilty of grievous bodily harm, aggravated assault, gross negligence manslaughter and ill treatment of normal degree to prison for 1 year and 10 months. Ahmad Akileh shall also pay 43 000 SEK damages to the woman’s husband Sven Wickman and 18 944 SEK to the estate of the deceased.

At the end of the session Akileh complained about the fact that he had a problem with his stomach and mental health problems that made the judge reduce the period in prison with a few months, a sentence that in reality should have been 2 years. The fact that he lied in 2007 and said that he was from Iraq instead of Lebanon in order to become a permanent residence permit in Sweden did not seem to influence the senctence, as he was not sentenced to expulsion after having served his sentence.

Many people, and even some of the journalists I mentioned in my earlier blog post that then defended the perpetrator, mean that the sentence is to lenient. The woman’s husband claims that the perpetrator got off lighty.

This is what Leif G.W. Person, a somewhat controversial Swedish criminologist says, when commenting on the sentence:

The whole thing took place in Landskrona on 29 March. The same Landskrona where the Sweden Democrats in the latest election got 22 per cent of the votes and valet and possible is it so bad that this can have had something to do with the case. Some kind of inverted racism that have jeopardized our equality before the law. Irrespective of what, both the sentence, the sentenced person and above all his defender, Leif Silbersky, have come as a a gift from above for the Sweden Democrats’ party leaders.

As a comparison we can examine another sentence that was pronounced recently, an imprisonment of five years. The perpetrator, Johan af Donner, former Communications chief of the Swedish Red Cross, was sentenced for serious aggravated fraud, breach of trust, being accessory to aggravated accounting fraud, untrue statement and complicity in obstructing in fiscal control (with reservation for that the legal term can be wrongly translated) against the Red Cross and the Swedish Cancer Society. He had swindled the organization out of millions of Swedish crowns.

The two sentences were pronounced within a week. The reactions when comparing the sentences have been massive and people are in an awful rage and they ask themselves how a human life can be so underestimated compared to money. For there is a trend in Sweden that a life is worth almost nothing when it comes to a judicial decision. Money and objects apparently seem to have a higher value.

The law courts have apparently abandoned human dignity. The 78-year-old lady on the parking lot has no value. She was a worthless creature that just as well could have been killed. This is what Swedish case law in plain language communicates. The perpetrators are glorified, they are defended and cuddled.

Even the the mass media show contempt for the ill-treated husband och the fact that he had witnessed how his wife was killed in the street. The media has shown greater indignation of mismanaged animals than they have done for the old couple in Landskrona.

So when is Sweden ready to do some research into this matter? To find out what is actually valuable in our society and what is not. Comparing the law courts’ sentences and fines. This would be a real challenge. The next, and inevitable question is of course why this is the case.

Advertisements

Read Full Post »

Yesterday afternoon, the Swedish artist Lars Vilks, was going to give a lecture at the University of Uppsala on freedom of speech in modern art. Vilks became known in 2007 for his Mohammed caricatures in form of a ”roundabout dog”, something that rendered him a fatwa. Now he is living under the constant supervision of the security police.

Here is a link to a film clip of the second part of the lecture, but on the same YouTube page, you will find more clips from the very attack.

Yesterday’s lecture had, apart from the ordinary audience, gathered a group of about 40 Muslims. When Vilks starts showing a piece of art on homosexuality among Muslims by another artist, he is bodily attacked by one of the Muslims and the total disorder is a fact. The police are attacked as well. Vilks is not severely injured, but is taken to hospital. But he was attacked once again outside the hospital. Today his site was hijacked.

When one of the policemen announces that the lecture is cancelled, the Muslims start shouting ”we succeeded in stopping him”. The attack was thus planned in advance, something that is proved by their conversations on Facebook here and here. There they also discuss the murder of Vilks.

This was an apparent attack on our freedom of speech and consequently on democracy. We can probably also forget about getting support from the secular Muslims. Even though they exist, they will neither be able to, nor have the guts to take sides against the medieval, undemocratic mob. It will be interesting to see if Swedish media will mitigate the attack (something they always do when immigrants are the perpetrators), or if they will adhere to their new policy, to ignore it completely and thus conceal it from the Swedish people.

The interesting thing is that everything that takes place in Sweden when immigrants are involved, is always being depicted by the media as an occasional and isolated occurrence: the murder in Landskrona, all the rapes, all rioting demonstrations against Israel, scandalous incidents committed by ”refugee children”, insurance frauds, unreliable employers with illegal labour, immigrants’ mendicancy, robberies and brutal attacks on Swedes. Even Muslim representatives’ and Muslim politicians’ claims for special treatment of Muslims is being described as ”not representative” för the majority of the Muslims. And all of the above incidents increase all the time.

Despite the propaganda, it is nowadays difficult to see them as isolated occurrences. Instead it is an adaptation to chaos. The same chaos that most of the immigrant Muslims are used to live in. It is strange that only one political party has realized this. It has nothing to do with unemployment. It has nothing to do with social exclusion. This is the costly price we are forced to pay for the multicultural society. The gradual adjustment to Islam.

Read Full Post »

The so-called “unaccompanied refugee children” is a governmental propaganda bluff that is uncritically passed on by the mass media without the least analysis or questioning. It is about young men up to the age of 30 who have no grounds for asylum but yet seek for asylum as “juveniles”, since it is the easiest and quickest way of getting into Sweden.

As fast as the young man (where are the girls?) has got his PUT, permanent residence permit (PUT), the relatives miraculously rise from the dead, show up asserting to be family migrants. In the cases that Merit Wager’s “miggas” (civil servants at the Migration Board who give anonymous reports of the situation) depict, there are 16 relative for three “unaccompanied”. This is more than 5 relatives per person, whose support is not guaranteed by the state, but debits the municipality’s budget of social allowances.

These relatives are often illiterates and will never be able to support themselves. Instead they long-term park on the budgets of the municipalities’ social costs in order to have lifelong financial support. They call for benefits from Sweden without giving anything back. It not surprising that the majority of the municipalities refuses to receive this group.

They come without exception to Europe by means of criminal smugglers that make a massive profit on this business. In order to get here they i generally pay a sum that corresponds to 10 000 euros. It has nothing at all to do with poor weaklings who go to Sweden. Because of the fact that Sweden indiscriminately opens its arms for them, Sweden’s government also contributes to a global criminal business.

In Norway dental analyses have shown that 93 per cent of the young men lied about their ages and was considerably older than they stated, in some cases ten years older. In Norway they now tighten up the rules and grant temporary residence permit (TUT), until the “child”is 18 years old. Then he is sent back to his native country.

Now that Norway has changed its rules, the country is not that attractive any longer, and the migrant smugglers chose other destinations. This means an ever higher pressure on the influx to Sweden. Sweden will have to receive yet more. And yet more. And yet more.

Denmark received 469 persons in this group during 2009. To Sweden, there were 2 250. It is a multiplication in just a few years. This year the Migration Board expects at least 3 000 to come, and instead of dealing with the smuggling, the government consider a compulsory legislation in order to force the municipalities to receive the “children”. They plan, thus, to run over the municipal right of self-determination, which is constitutional, in order to continue this insane handling.

Every “child” costs 1 900 SEK/day = 693 500 SEK/year (69 300 EUR). On top of this there are costs for the school, (64 300 SEK/year and per senior high school student), administrator, medical care, daily allowance etc. And also a basic compensation to the municipality of 500 000 SEK in order to “facilitate the reception and increase the quality”. The cost ends consequently up in at least 1,3 million SEK “child” and year.

There seems to be an inexhaustible cash box to spend money from when it comes to so-called refugees, while all Swedes have to suffer from cutbacks, reduced pensions and other deterioration.

The seven parliamentary parties think that they will get away with this policy. They refuse even to debate the issue. I hope that the Swedes will disappoint them thoroughly!

Follow my blog with bloglovin

Read Full Post »