Posts Tagged ‘Fredrik Reinfeldt’

Author: S R Larson (presentation)

Since the Swedish Democrats took seats in the Riksdag (Sweden’s parliament) in September last year, the party has been under constant attack from the political mainstream and the self-appointed elite mainstream media. The attacks are driven by a desire to isolate and, eventually, destroy the Swedish Democrats.

The attacks are spearheaded by Prime Minister Reinfeldt, who – as this blog has reported – does not think sympathizers and active members of the Swedish Democrats deserve the same protection from the state as other Swedes do. This explicit sanctioning of politically driven harassment and violence is of course unbecoming of a country that considers itself part of the free world. It calls into question whether Sweden can actually be considered a functioning parliamentary democracy; so far, the Swedish Democrats have prevailed and managed to exercise influence over the legislative process in the Riksdag.

But what happens if the political harassment and violence actually succeeds? What happens if the prime minister has it his way and the Swedish Democrats implode under the pressure?

It is not hard to see what Reinfeldt himself thinks will happen. He would enjoy a return to the political status quo that preceded last year’s election. Issues pertaining to the country’s reckless immigration policies would once again be swept under the carpet. The mainstream media outlets could once again resort to cover-ups of Sweden’s rampant crime rates, the genocide-scale sexual violence against ethnically Swedish women and the enormous costs that the welfare-driven immigration imposes on taxpayers.

In the circles of Sweden’s political elite things would be back to normal. They would once again be able to go to upscale dinner parties in Stockholm’s posh inner city districts and pretend that the world outside the limousine windows does not exist. Truth-sayers need not apply.

The real consequences of a demise of the Swedish Democrats would be fundamentally different. The hundreds of thousands who actively or tacitly support the SD would not change their minds about immigration. Those supporters now represent 6-8 percent of all voters, possibly with another 2-3 percent who could vote for SD but so far have not “come out”. These people would still want to see a change in immigration policy, and their determination to achieve such a change would only be emboldened if they perceived that the political and media elite had crushed SD.

Where would they turn? There are at least two political movements that would stand in line to scoop up disgruntled SD supporters: the National Democrats and the Swedish Resistance Movement.

The National Democrats have won seats in some local parliaments but have never become a force to be reckoned with on the national scene. Ostensibly, this is due to the success of SD, as the two parties share some important elements in their criticism of Sweden’s immigration policies. But there are also important differences between ND and SD that help explain why the latter, not the former, now has seats in the Riksdag. Unlike SD, ND has never made any categorical statements against the use of force to achieve political goals.

The very fact that ND has left the door open to violent campaigns makes the party dangerous. There has been some criticism among the ranks of ND that SD has sold itself to the parliamentary process. Should SD fail in its intentions to close the flood gates in Sweden’s immigration policy, the ND would be quick to seize the momentum that SD has created. They would market themselves as superficially peaceful and ramp up their violent efforts at forcing their policies upon the Swedish people.

A major difference between SD and ND is that ND is a nationalist party, as opposed to the patriotic SD. Patriotism is love for your country without resentment or hostility toward other countries and cultures; nationalism is love for your country based on such resentment and hostility. This difference is crucial and helps explain what the National Democrats would be capable of, should they gain political momentum.

The Swedish Resistance Movement shares ND’s basic principles of nationalism, but builds its policies explicitly on a Nazi platform. They distance themselves from parliamentarianism and embrace the totalitarian ideology of the Third Reich. Their attitude to political violence tends to be one of outcome, not of principle.

SD is a peaceful, democratic movement. Should they be marginalized and made irrelevant by ugly strong-arming tactics, and be forced out as a result of relentless harassment and violence, there is no doubt that ND and the Swedish Resistance Movement would be the real winners. Should Sweden be brought to that point, a new level of political violence could erupt. That eruption could be strong enough to hurl the country into a stage that proxies a civil war.

No, I am not exaggerating. Already today, Sweden is plagued by a high level of politically driven violence, more so than any other European country. A lot of the violence goes undetected – or unreported – by the mainstream media but is picked up by alternative news outlets. An escalation of this violence, driven by a surge in support for violent anti-immigration movements, would make its way into mainstream media as well. The political elite would be faced with a terrible reality: their country is about to fall apart.

I pray to God that Sweden will never be hurled into the dungeons of such a political, social and economic disaster. I fear, though, that we can no longer rule out this scenario as a possible future for Sweden four, maybe five years ahead.

If there is any reason and intellectual decency left in the circles of Sweden’s political elite, they will see the writing on the wall and start working with SD as a serious political player. If on the other hand they turn a blind eye to the political and social realities in their country, they will be responsible for the ultimate destruction of what was once a thriving, peaceful and prosperous democracy.

bv, pi, pi, ft, ft, tg, tg, tg, vg, vg, vg, vl, vl, vl, vl, po, po, nr, nr, nr
st, st, st, av, bt, bt, br, db, db, db, gd, gd, gd, ek, ek, ek, cw, ne, ne, ne, mnd, mnd, mnd, mnd, ft, ft, ad, ad, ad, ad, ad, ad, bs, bs, bs, bs, bs, bs, ln, ln, svt, svt, svt, dm, svt, svt, svt, sr, sr, sr, sr, sr, sr, sr, sr, sr, sr, kk, kk, cc, ha, aa, kt, dn, dn, dn, dn, dn, svd, svd, svd, gp, gp, gp, ex, ex, bn, vb, vb, nsk, nsk

Read Full Post »

So, finally Sweden has had its first terrorist attack. A self-bomber killed himself i central Stockholm Saturday afternoon i the middle of the Christmas trade. His car also exploded a few blocks from the man just before he killed himself. Before he had also send a recorded message and a threatening e-mail to the TT (The Swedish Central News Agency), part of which is as follows:

To the Swedish people. Thanks to Lars Vilks and his paintings of the prophet Mohammed and your soldiers in Afghanistan and your silence on all this your children, daughters, brothers and sisters shall die as our brothers and sisters and children die.

Now the Islamic state has fulfilled what they have promised you. We are here in Europe and in Sweden, we are a reality, no idea, that is all I want to say about this. Our actions will talk for themselves. As long as you don’t stop your war against Islam and the degradation against the prophet and your stupid support to the pig Vilks.

And to all Muslims in Sweden I say: stop fawning on and degrading yourselves for a degrading life far from Islam. Help your brothers and sisters and do not fear anyone or anything, just God that you adore.

And to my family, try to forgive med. I couldn’t sit and watch when all injustice takes place against Islam and the prophet when the pig Vilks did what he did. Forgive my lies. I never went to the The Middle East to work or earn money. I went there for Jihad. I hope you can understand me some time. I could never have told you for you or anyone else. My dear wife and children, I love you. My love for you was never a lie. Forgive me for not telling you anything. Give kisses to the children. Tell them that daddy loves them and will always do.

Finally I greet all mujaheddin, don’t forget me in your prayers. Pray for me that here in Sweden the Muslims are so degraded that they pray for non-Muslims in their mosques. And finally to all mujaheddin in Europe and in Sweden: now it is time to strike. Don’t wait any longer. Come out with what you have even though it is a knife and I know that you have more to bring. Don’t fear anyone, don’t fear any prison, don’t fear death.

Here is another newly produced private video on the terrorist bomber and the actual explosion.

Now, is anyone a tiny bit familiar with the actual situation in Sweden surprised? For the man in the street, this was of course a surprise. He is constantly kept in the dark about Sweden’s lax immigrations provisions, which make it possible for over 95% of the immigrants to get a residence permit and life long economic support without having to prove their identity.

According to the journalist Per Gudmundson, Sweden and England have been safe havens for this kind of criminals in the 1990s and the most important refuges for the Arab-Afghan (his blog on this is partly in English):

This period was also characterized, according to al-Suri, by the dissemination of jihadi ideology, especially from Britain and the Scandinavian countries, ‘where they, at least for the time being, were able to exploit the relatively relaxed security conditions and the welfare conditions.

Our Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt made a wan statement after the attack, in which he condemned the crime, but directly urged people not to take advantage of the situation by letting out one’s fear. The latter part of the sentence seemed to be the most important thing to convey.

He also concluded “Sweden is now a part of the global world”. Well, he seems to be the last to realize this, even though he has strived very hard for the multicultural paradise, believing that it is possible to combine with the Swedish naiveté and credulity. Reinfeldt actually uses this phrase in order to free himself from responsibility of the present society. His conclusion is apparent: If we now ARE a part of the global world, he and his government must be innocent. This is supported by his statement “We must live with this”. Really? Do we? Why?

I now have the title of a new book that needs to be written on Sweden: How to ruin a country without telling the people. Who dares to write it?

Follow my blog with bloglovin

dn, dn, dn, dn, svd, svd, svd, svd, gp, gp, gp, sds, sds, sds, sds, expr, expr, bot, botblt, blt, dagen, dagen, hd, hd, kbl, kbl, lt, lt, nsk, nsk, skd, skd, skd, smp, smp, ya, ya

Read Full Post »

The other week Sweden’s Prime Minister Fredrik Reinfeldt admitted that Sweden has got extensive immigration problems. He also stated that Sweden admits too many immigrants:

“Sweden admits more asylum seekers than the US and the EU together. This is not a balanced policy”, he says, and finishes by saying that Sweden has a lot to learn from Finland.

Yes, Reinfeldt is right. The following figures show the insanity of the Swedish mass immigration. If the other countries below granted as many residence permits as Sweden in proportion to their population, the figures would look like the ones below:

France would then have admitted 580.128 asylum seekers instead of 106.770.
The US: 553.380 instead of 89.460
Germany: 750.228 instead of 68.900
Finland: 48.531 instead of 11.360
Italy: 565.868 instead of 61.970
The Netherlands: 150.878 instead of 35.410
Denmark: 49.788 instead of 7.960
Poland: 350.716 instead of 25.000
Belgium: 94.623 instead of 40.560
Ireland: 37.414 instead of 10.550
Austria: 74.660 instead of 40.590
Greece: 102.499 instead of 60.920
Spain: 368.289 instead of 15.180
Portugal: 96.905 instead of 520

(Source: UNHCR)

However, the most remarkable is not that Reinfeldt tells the truth. The most remarkable is that he pronounces it – AND IN FINLAND! Another truth is that he cannot possibly state this axiom in Sweden.

In less than two months there will be a parliamentary election in Sweden. The election campaign so far hasn’t touched upon Sweden’s immense immigration. It won’t do that neither. This question is tabooed in Sweden. Anyone who dares to whisper anything negative about the prevailing immigration policy is instantly regarded or rejected as xenophobic or a racist. By the authorities. By the media.

There is only one political party, the Sweden Democrats, that proposes a reduction of the influx. This party is not yet seated in the parliament, but is a big threat for the seven parliamentary parties since it will probably get into the parliament after the election according to the majority of all the opinion polls. So this party is completely ignored, and even constantly defamed in all media as being xenophobic, even though the party only demands an immigration at the same level as all the other European countries.

All the political parties refuse to participate in debates with the Sweden Democrats. The “seven sisters” of the parliament have also declared that they will never cooperate with the Sweden Democrats in the parliament. They would rather cooperate across the party blocs.

Fredrik Reinfeldt would thus never admit publicly in Sweden that the Sweden Democrats are right. This is a tacit agreement among the parliamentary parties (and the media). But abroad he can admit it. Doesn’t this say all about the lack of honesty that permeates the political climate in Sweden?

An ironic election poster on this issue published by the site Valaffisch. The text in English: “Sweden admits too many immigrants, but I only dare to say this to the Finnish media”. Blue text: “We keep Swedish people in the dark”

Read Full Post »